![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.iangrandjean.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/new-nikons.jpg\")
<\/a>…and I’m trying to figure out why they bothered with the second one, the 26mm ‘pancake’ lens, at all.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
I mean, what’s the point? There are already 24mm and 28mm lenses for the Z series, and one of the 24’s is even an ‘S’ (and the other’s DX)<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Sure, it’s pretty small, but it’s full-frame and so logically would be used on the Z6\/7 rather than the Z50…<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The 85mm f\/1.2 is obviously just a priviledge lens – what you buy when you’ve got cash left over from buying Leicas etc. Oh yes, the \u00ab\u00a0I know a lot but never actually take photos\u00a0\u00bb crowd over on Nikon rumour sites will try to convince you it’s a \u00ab\u00a0must-have\u00a0\u00bb lens for the beautiful Bokeh…. which the 85mm f\/1.8 has in buckets, and is a third of the price….(I know, I recently sold mine)<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Nikon has a sterling set of f\/2.8 primes and zooms, and having a ‘second’ series of, for instance, f\/1.8 primes makes a lot of sense in my book – the maximum opening doesn’t make the front element SO large you need exotic filter sizes (for ND or protection or whatever) and the physical size\/weight means you don’t have to employ slaves to carry all your gear.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
It would be nice if Nikon were to actually consider what people want and\/or need rather than just going off at a tangent with weird and wonderful lenses deemed ‘important’ – why not produce a few exotics, sure, but don’t forget the mere mortals who buy a lot of your production who possibly don’t need, and certainly can’t afford, this stuff.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
At least, over the water in Japan – Nikon have just added two new lenses to the Z lineup… …and I’m trying to figure out why they bothered with the second one, the 26mm ‘pancake’ lens, at all. I mean, what’s the point? There are already 24mm and 28mm lenses for the Z series, and … <\/p>\n